At its Plenary Session of 7-8 April 2016, the Committee of the Regions adopted an Opinion on the "Modernisation of EU copyright rules". The rapporteur for this opinion was Arnoldas Abramavicius (LT/EPP), Member of Zarasai District Municipal Council.
As part of their preliminary analysis, on 19 January 2016, the CoR held a hearing with invited stakeholders, who answered many questions on different aspects of the EC Communication published in December 2015: “Towards a modern, more European copyright framework COM(2015) 626 – final”
The authors’ associations selected for the hearing were: EWC, EFJ, and ECSA. Additional organisations included consumer representatives, CMOs, SMEs’, Media companies, publishers, booksellers, cultural heritage institutions (libraries), and the Young Pirates.
The full text of the opinion will shortly be available in all EU language versions on the CoR.europa.eu website.
Published on 25/03/2015
"Digital technology is part of everyday life. From watching films, buying or selling online to connecting with friends – the internet is a goldmine of opportunities. But EU people and companies run into many barriers, such as geo-blocking or cross-border parcel delivery inefficiencies."
The Juncker Commission has made it a priority to remove these obstacles and create a Digital Single Market. The College of Commissioners had a first discussion on the Digital Single Market Strategy due in May.
Based on the work of Vice-President Ansip and his team, the College set out three main areas on which Commission action will focus during this mandate:
1. Better access for consumers and businesses to digital goods and services;
2. Shaping the environment for digital networks and services to flourish;
3. Creating a European Digital Economy and Society with long-term growth potential.
The above includes the following priority:
· “Modernising law to ensure the right balance between the interests of creators and those of users or consumers. It will improve people's access to culture – and therefore support cultural diversity – while opening new opportunities for artists and content creators and ensuring a better enforcement of rights.”
To read the full text:
This Authors’ Rights event was held at the European Parliament (Brussels) on 3.11.2014.
“The Value of Writers’ Works” was an evidence-based forum addressing the challenges that concern European authors in the text and book sector in all genres, including screen-writers and literary translators. The threefold thematic platform gave the opportunity to professional writers to discuss their perspectives; it also aimed at calling the attention of the Members of the European Parliament to follow-up from the study on copyright contract law and contractual practices requested by the European Parliament Legal Affairs Committee (JURI); it was important also to receive an update on recent and forthcoming studies by the European Commission. The interconnection between the digital and its effects on the authors’ remuneration and compensation was at the crossroads of several topics.” Myriam Diocaretz, from the editor’s introduction.
The PDF is available in our Publications page.
Question on “Non-implementation of the Public Lending Right in Europe to the European Commission by Zuzana Roithová (PPE), Member of the European Parliament
On 22 July MEP Z. Roithová sent the Parliamentary letter for a written answer, highlighting three key questions:
1. What steps and measures will the Commission take in connection with the violation of EU legislation by several Member States in their non-implementation of the public lending right pursuant to Directive 92/100/EEC (2006/115/EC)?
2. When does the Commission intend to bring infringement procedures in this matter against the abovementioned Member States?
3. What are the reasons for the failure to complete the internal market regarding the public lending right in order to provide fair compensation for authors for the lending of their works?
The European Commission Replies
On 31 August, Mr. Michel Barnier, European Commissioner for Internal Market and Services answered the letter on behalf of the Commission. Mr. Barnier’s response focuses on three points:
1. The Commission's practice is to commence infringement proceedings once a complaint makes a reasonably substantiated allegation that the EU Treaty or secondary legislation is not respected.
2. The Commission has, at this stage, not received any substantiated complaints that the Member States mentioned in the Honourable Member's question have committed a breach of EC laws.
3. There are indeed several reasons why the public lending right is not applied in a uniform manner for the benefit of authors throughout the European Union. These reasons are not, however, linked to the enforcement policy of the Commission but rather the wording of Directive 92/100/EEC(1) on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (as codified by Directive 2006/115/EC).
For the full text of the Commissioner’s reply: