EWC
  • ABOUT US
    • WHO WE ARE
    • OUR BOARD and Team
    • OUR MEMBERS
    • STATUTES
    • MEDIA
    • CONTACT US
  • NEWS
    • NEWSROOM
    • EVENTS
    • PROJECTS
      • #FREE ALL WORDS
      • AGAINST WRITOIDS
  • ALLIANCES
    • JOINT STATEMENTS
    • STAKEHOLDERS
  • AUTHORS’ RIGHTS
    • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    • ARTISTIC FREEDOM
    • CONTRACTS
    • EDUCATIONAL SECTOR
    • E-LENDING
    • PLR
    • STATEMENTS
    • SURVEYS
    • WORKING GROUPS
  • CULTURE POLICY
    • DAY OF EUROPEAN AUTHORS
    • #BEHINDEVERYBOOK
    • CRISIS MONITORING
    • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • CULTURAL EXCHANGE
    • EWC BURNING ISSUES FORUM
    • EWC LITERARY EVENTS

CURRENT PROJECT

Free All Words#FreeAllWords: International Text and Translation Fund of the European Writers‘ Council (EWC) gives a voice to authors from Belarus and Ukraine

freeallwords.com

EWC welcomes the WIPO SCOPING STUDY ON PUBLIC LENDING RIGHT

12th April 2024

PLR is a commitment to fairness: The EWC welcomes the PLR Study by Sabine Richly for the WIPO SCCR 45

For the Forty-Fifth Session of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR 45) in Geneva, April 15 to 19, 2024, the  SCOPING STUDY ON PUBLIC LENDING RIGHT, prepared by Sabine Richly, MBA, LL.M, will be presented and discussed. The EWC had constantly supported the corresponding proposal for a WIPO Scoping PLR Study by the Republics of Sierra Leone, Panama, and Malawi.

The presented scoping study by Sabine Richly (Digital Media Law) for the WIPO SCCR 45 offers a comparative analysis of PLR systems across different countries, with the goal to spot similarities, differences, and best practices within these global systems. The EWC – its Secretary-General Nicole Pfister Fetz and Nina George, Commissioner for Political Affairs – was honoured to provide perspectives and insights from the writers’ views and monitorings on PLR, along with Arjen Polman of PLR International, Carola Streul (EVA), Anne Bergman-Tahon (FEP), Christina de Castell, (IFLA) and Anita Huss (IFRRO).
From the summary
“The study demonstrates the adaptability of Public Lending Right (in the following: PLR) systems to diverse national cultural goals and economic contexts, as evidenced by the 35 systems currently in operation (“active systems”) and a number of systems in development worldwide. Most of these systems, reflecting a spectrum of policy objectives and national circumstances, exemplify the alignment of PLR with local needs. The establishment of a robust PLR system requires the close cooperation and collaborative efforts among government, library, and rightholder representatives to achieve meaningful compensation without straining library budgets.”
The EWC was able to draw attention on the legit interest of authors, to be remunerated for this use of their works. Some selected arguments were given:
From the perspective of many stakeholders, authors need to be compensated for these uses as they provide the material that libraries need in order to fulfil their mission for the knowledge and cultural societies. They consider their work a key contribution to the social pact between creators and libraries that benefits society. The European Writers’ Council (EWC) argues, based on the principle that every use of a copyrighted work should be subject to exclusive rights or at least a remuneration, that:
  • in many countries lending figures are just as large as sales and therefore affect the primary
    markets of authors and publishers.
  • PLR payments can help to ensure a thriving literary sector, as compensation for loans also
    generates an increase in income, which is positively reflected in tax payments, as well as
    in the pension and social security contributions of authors who are often employed as
    freelancers (writers, translators, illustrators, for example).
  • By investing in authors through PLR, the state not only supports the well-being of creators
    during their working lives but also alleviates future burdens on state budgets. PLR may
    serve as a safeguard against old-age poverty experienced by freelancers in cultural
    sectors and offers substantial benefits to state budgets, especially in areas like pensions
    and unemployment benefits.
On Remuneration
It should be noted, that all three concepts, copyright law systems, PLR specific systems and systems under a general Arts and Culture Policy are equally acceptable from the authors’ perspective (EWC) as long as they provide for more than a symbolic payment.
On bilateral agreements
Also, reciprocal agreements offer authors a significant advantage, particularly when robust markets allocate a proportional share to smaller markets. The funds allocated to other country by agreement , however, should, according to the European Writers’ Council, always be capped relative to the total budget to ensure that authors from developing countries or languages with limited circulation benefit from being lent in nations with a high number of readers. (…)
The authors’ perspective (here represented by EWC) is of the opinion that also in developing countries, “the authors and several providers of the book sector play a vital role in direct and indirect benefits they generate for every economy (employment, tax, regional development) and the society.
EWC suggests exploring the possibility of reciprocal agreements as set out in more detail under Chapter 6.1.3.1.
Appropriate funding of loans is a safeguard for the preservation of cultural heritage, diversity of languages, written culture, and enables fair access to literature and culture across different population groups – the access to create and to raise their own voice, therefore protecting cultural and intellectual resources for future generations (intergenerational equity).

The EWC calls on WIPO Member States, to foster knowledge exchange on PLR such as regional seminars or advisory pools with the involvement of rights holders and PLR enablers, to support interested countries without PLR yet, to explore a tailor-made solution for their legal and budgetary environment.

Previous Post
WIPO SCCR45: Joint Statement by observing Authors, Publishers and CMOs
Next Post
WIPO SCCR45: EWC comments the PLR Scoping Study

CULTURE POLICY

EWC Resolution: The Threats by US AI Tech Oligopolies on culture, authors’ rights and freedom of Expression

June 3, 2025

A CALL FOR TRANSPARENCY REGARDING AI GENERATED BOOKS – Joint Statement

April 23, 2025

EIBF, FEP, EWC – Common Statement: For the sake of the book chain and democracy

October 18, 2023

The Unseen Sequels: Final monitoring on the Economic Impact of Covid-19

July 19, 2023

EWC project #Freeallwords translated text by Nobel Price for Peace Laureate

December 9, 2022

Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Copyright Ecosystem

September 3, 2022
EWC
info@europeanwriterscouncil.eu
+32 2 290 92 50
European Writers’ Council
(EWC-FAEE AISBL)
Rue du Prince Royal 85-87
1050 Brussels
Belgium
Get in touch
Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn
EWC
IMPRINT
PRIVACY POLICY
MEMBERS AREA
Related Links
balticwriterscouncil.info
ceatl.eu
culturalcreators.eu
ifrro.org
plrinternational.com
Current Projects
Free All Words


Fee and Translation Fund for texts by Authors from Countries under pressure


We, writers, claim for our rights as authors and professionals.

© 2022 European Writers’ Council | All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue to use this site, you agree with it. PRIVACY POLICY