On 26 November, the 90th birthday of the Belarusian writer Uladzimir Karatkievich, the video reading campaign #freewordsbelarus will be launched on the EWC Daily–Motion-channel.
The joint action of the European Writers’ Council (EWC) and the European Council of Literary Translators’ Associations (CEATL) is a strong sign of solidarity with the Belarusian people and the detained Belarusian authors and artists.
Brussels/Stockholm/Minsk, 25 November 2020
“It is with horror that we, the writers and translators of Europe, follow the current situation in Belarus”, says Nina George, President of the European Writers’ Council (EWC). “Dictators have always threatened authors and artists first because that is where the most intrepid resistance can be expected. Our colleagues stand in the front line to defend the values of democracy.” – “But they are not alone”, adds Morten Visby, President of the European Council of Literary Translators’ Associations (CEATL). “Europe is watching and will not look away: We see the regime’s violence and oppression, we see the attacks on freedom of expression, but we also hear the brave voices from Belarus refusing to be silenced. We stand by you – and raise our voices for the Belarusian democracy movement.”
The solidarity campaign #freewordsbelarus presents The Border from the book “Frescoes” by Barys Pjatrovitj, the Chair of The Union of Belarusian Writers, translated into English by a translator who prefers to stay anonymous – for safety reasons.
The Border, read in 35 single sentences, is recomposed, piece by piece, and reader by reader, by the voices, faces and feelings of European writers and translators. The complete list of the Presidents, Chairs and Board Members (next page) speaks for itself.
“Taking an immediate stand for the Belarusian people is crucial and decisive. Not only as an act of solidarity with the people of Belarus, but also in a broader sense for the inviolability of democracy and freedom of speech in the whole of Europe”, underlines Grethe Rottböll, President of the Swedish Writers’ Union, who initiated this supportive action together with the Chair of the International Council, Viveka Sjögren Bangoura. “With the #freewordsbelarus-action, 36 presidents and board members from 33 writers’ and translators’ organisations from 22 countries raise their voice for the Belarusian democracy movement, representing 120,000 authors from Europe, who stand in solidarity.”
An excerpt from The Border, by Barys Pjatrovitj:
… and there is no need to mention the cycle, the onset-rising-shining-setting, the border between the light and the darkness that is called “evening” in the evening and “morning” in the morning, and which – in one country – is called totalitarianism, authoritarianism, and the incursion of tyranny.
#freewordsbelarus #Свабодныясловыбеларусь is created in a collaboration of the European Writers’ Council (EWC) and the European Council of Literary Translators’ Associations (CEATL) on the initiative of the Swedish Writers’ Union together with the Union of Belarusian Writers. The 36 readers – see the complete list on page 2 – show their support with white and red garments, the colours of the democracy movement in Belarus. The video project was realized with the funding by the German Writers’ Union VS, the Verband deutscher Schriftstellerinnen und Schriftsteller together with KULTURWERK e.V.
The European Writers’ Council (EWC) is the federation of 46 national organisations of writers and translators in 30 countries including the EU, as well as Belarus, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey and Montenegro, representing 160,000 authors, altogether writing in 31 languages.
The European Council of Literary Translators’ Associations (CEATL) is the federation of 35 member associations from 29 countries, representing 10,000 individual translators.
Directed and arranged by Lo Bergsteinsson.
The readers in order of appearance (name, organisation, position, country)
Bel Olid, Associació D’escriptors En Llengua Catalana AELC, President, Spain
Joanne Harris, Society of Authors, Chair, United Kingdom
Eystein Hanssen, Forfatterforbundet, Chair, Norway
Morten Visby, Danish Writers’ Association / CEATL, Chair/President, Denmark
Teodora Tzankova, Bulgarian Translators’ Union, Vice-President, Bulgaria
Manuel Rico Rego, Asociación Colegial de Escritores ACE, President, Spain
Jens J. Kramer, SYNDIKAT e.V., Chair, Germany
Eva Valvo, Strade, Board Member, Italy
Philip Pullman, Society of Authors, President, United Kingdom
Hannele Mikaela Taivassalo, The Society of Swedish Authors in Finland, President, Finland
Justyna Czechowska, Polish Literary Translators Association, Board member,Poland
Leonidas Galazis , Literature and Criticism Association, President, Cyprus
Arno Jundze, Latvian Writers’ Union, Chair, Latvia
Gertrud Maes, Auteursbond, Delegate CEATL, Netherlands
Tanja Petrič, Slovenian Association of Literary Translators, President, Slovenia
Viveka Sjögren Bangoura, The Swedish Writers’ Union, Chair of the International Council, Sweden
Charlotte Collins, Translators’ Association , Co-Chair, United Kingdom
Daniel Cristea-Enache, Writers’ Union of Romania / European Writers’ Council, Director of Communication, Vice-President, Romania
Juliane Wammen, Danish Translators’ Association, Chair, Denmark
Nina George, European Writers’ Council, President, Europe
Hilde Lyng, The Norwegian Association of Literary Translators, Chair , Norway
Werner Richter, IG Übersetzerinnen Übersetzer, Chair, Austria
Endre Szkarosi, Society of Hungarian Authors, President, Hungary
Jeroen Thijssen, Auteursbond, Secretary, Netherlands
Lena Falkenhagen, Verband deutscher Schriftstellerinnen und Schriftsteller (VS), Chair, Germany
Ondřej Lipár, Czech Writers’ Association, Chair, Czech Republic
Yiorgos Chouliaras, Hellenic Authors’ Society, President, Greece
Lissa Oliver, Irish Writers’ Union, Chair, Ireland
Daiva Daugirdiene, The Lithuanian Association of Literary Translators, Chair, Lithuania
Francesca Novajra, Associazione italiana traduttori e interpreti, Delegate CEATL, Italy
Grethe Rottböll, Swedish Writers’ Union, President, Sweden
Thomas Weiler, German Literary Translators’ Association (VdÜ), Member, Germany
Nicola Solomon , Society of Authors, Chief Executive, United Kingdom
Jaakko Kankaanpää, KAOS, Chair , Finland
Geir Hønneland, Norwegian Non-Fiction Writers and Translators Association, Chair, Norway
Barys Pjatrovitj, Union of Belarusian Writers, President, Belarus.
The Border by Barys Pjatrovitj
the eyes are falling down under the feet, as if the apples in late autumn
– roundly, impetuously, painfully – even the dogs are groaning so piteous, looking at the full moon or the sun that has not hidden yet behind the tree tops or only appeared over them;
who must we trust: the sun or ourselves, the people or the apples, the dogs or the eyes? The writer from Germany shouts: “Everyone to his trade”, and I am recalling Nietzsche and Rotterdam, Spinoza and Nice, and thinking: everything is relative – relative to what is seen by our fallen-scattered eyes and understood by our mind; all is relational or relatival, and not in a different way, and not differently, because otherwise the cows will be grazing in the river, and the pikes will be hunting for wolves in the woods, the night will become the day as the moon will be the sun now, and a quick sparrow will turn into the thick green grass there where a cow [“korova”] has left its korovai;
and there is no need to mention the cycle, the onset-rising-shiningsetting, the border between the light and the darkness that is called “evening” in the evening and “morning” in the morning, and which – in one country – is called totalitarianism, authoritarianism, and the incursion of tyranny –
is it approaching or leaving? is it rising or declining? I have asked silence about it – silence in reply, not a word, not a sound, there is only a flight of a scythe and the moan of the mowings, only a flight of a ball and the howl of a mown football player, Number 11 is making an 11meter kick – the symbolism ends here, but there appears the intrigue: who will whom or whom will who?
i do not like questions that ostensibly give you the right to choose without actually giving it to you, I always think: why “or/or” instead of “and/and” – it would be more fair for the hungry and the full, for supporters and oppositionists, for those who have been drawn near and those who have fallen into disfavor, for you yourself who should learn from others’ mistakes and not be offended if you forget your own ones, and they repeat with a terrifying consistency, which even allows you to draw the formula: (an+an+1+an+2+an+3+an+4…) etc., provided one case equals one case and it does not repeat only if this case is worth not repeating and remaining in the list.